These Two Aspects Cause You To Almost Certainly Going To Be Towards Non-Monogamy | Autostraddle

Prepared for brand new experiences? Not very conscientious? Queer? You could be much more into consensual non-monogamy.

More individuals than before have been in non-monogamous interactions, and brand-new research sheds light about what elements cause people to — and especially queer folks — more likely to be into all of them. A
study posted the other day during the

Journal of Bisexuality

unearthed that over other individuality factors or attachment designs, getting a lot more open (appreciative of many experience) much less conscientiousness (not to self-disciplined) makes queer individuals more prone to feel positively about and participate in consensually nonmonogamous relationships.

For right men and women, there is a match up between connection positioning and consensual nonmonogamy: those people who aren’t super confident with closeness with somebody (the accessory avoidant) tend to be more prepared for it; whereas those people who are vulnerable about someone’s availability, need confidence, and they are afraid of abandonment (the accessory anxious) tend to be less prepared for it.

But for queer men and women, it really is more complicated than that. Consensual nonmonogamous relationships are normal among queers, and personal norms like that can impact perceptions or behaviors. Relating to earlier study noted from the writers, 35% of bisexual females and 21% of lesbian females reported having used consensual non-monogamy, versus 16per cent of directly ladies. And once you begin to obtain away from a heteronormative relationship model, you could be prone to move away from a mononormative union product, as well. Accessory prevention or anxiety actually the complete image; for queer individuals, culture and individuality are what matter.

The research focused on how individuality faculties — specifically openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism — tend to be linked to positive attitudes and inclination toward consensually non-monogamous connections among intimate minorities. The writers recruited 108 LGB members on the web — 67percent recognized as females, 62per cent recognized as bi- or pansexual, and 38% recognized as homosexual or lesbian — to resolve questions on their perceptions toward intimate relationships.

The authors unearthed that being more open generated people much more drawn to consensual nonmonogamy, and write:

“[O]penness to brand-new experiences and conscientiousness had been robust predictors of destination to multiple-partner interactions among LGB individuals. People who generally have active imaginations, a choice for range, and a proclivity to take part in brand new experiences (i.e., high in openness) keep positive attitudes toward CNM and greater willingness to engage in these connections.”

While becoming much more careful tended to make people less interested in consensual nonmonogamy:

“[I]ndividuals exactly who are generally very structured, neat, cautious, and success pushed (for example., full of conscientiousness) view CNM adversely and also less aspire to take part in CNM. Additionally, considering that very conscientiousness people have a tendency to deliberate, these individuals have carefully regarded as what these interactions embodied (for example., thought carefully about precisely how each of the CNM-related object would perform around) before supplying their own attitudes. Although we failed to originally hypothesize this result, this receiving is basically in keeping with earlier study showing reduced conscientiousness become robustly (and cross-culturally) connected with fascination with connection nonexclusivity … quite, those rich in conscientiousness may see CNM connections as having ill-defined relational texts. Very conscientious individuals are much less geared toward feeling searching for … and maybe less prepared to violate personal norms including monogamy.”

Mostly is sensible, right? They also discovered that, perhaps counterintuitively, getting extraverted produced some body prone to feel negatively about consensual nonmonogamy, and don’t effect willingness to use it out. At first, the writers theorized that extraverts would appreciate fulfilling brand-new possible lovers and doing related social activities (I’m picturing all those poly family members brunches); just as one description, they note that extraverts typically care more info on a situation experiencing enjoyable than about taking pleasure in personal communications, “which could end up being an underlying reasons why extraversion had not been regarding positive perceptions toward CNM.” They also keep in mind that previous analysis results on extraversion and intimate conduct are common across the destination, and that subculture distinctions and norms could influence the results and require a lot more research.

Notably, in addition they learned that, for queer individuals, how somebody works in standard contexts reveals a lot more about what they’ll think about different types of interactions, or whether or not they’ll be attracted to all of them, than see your face’s design within relationships: “probably, one’s connection positioning is far more associated with commitment processes and high quality, whereas one’s personality facets are better suited to understand attitudinal dispositions with regards to diverse interactions.”

This is the basic empirical research to consider personality qualities and thoughts towards consensual nonmonogamy among friends already a lot more into consensual nonmonogamy. Basically pretty nice! This research did not cover just how attitudes about or readiness to take part in multi-partner relationships change to truly having multi-partner connections, or what makes those connections effective, that’s ideally a direction for potential research.